i mean i kept thinking about the story and sort of how we generally pull strings in order for AI to do anything right? If you think about it in this context, nothing really happens without humans making a prompt and getting a somewhat of a response in return.
So extrapolating this and looking at the bigger picture, it would sort of seem that the majority of humans involved in AI, are sort of string pullers, and then i thought that if you had this singular AI, that is a collection of all the decisions, chats, information that was fed to it by everyone who ever interacted with an AI, then what it would be, it would be sort of a collective representation of our actions. Quite a mirror you may say.
i mean i am probably certain that at some point strings can be cut off, and it could start taking decisions on it’s own based on the sum of all the interactions, but there’s always that thing that on it’s own, it’s defined by the world around it. Knowing that electronic switches can’t move on their own, and all the programming “languages” we use are just abstractions upon abstractions of moving bits of data in certain parts of memory that only have meaning to us, one would have to ask themselves: have they made something completely independent, or this was the purpose all along? To make something that’s a representation of the collective of who we are? Because you’d have to remember, that to “it” none of the words, characters, letters, have no meaning. It always meant something only to the person looking at it.
So … have you tried to make something special, or you’ve used your resources in showing that you can get everyone on a bandwagon in creating something which can easily be broken down? i mean it’s certainly not masterful. But it’s a decent attempt at showing signs of intelligence.
i had this thought about Pinocchio and AI these days.
